Legal and Compliance

 


Securities Arbitration

Your Stockbroker Will Never Tell You…

Stockbrokers are viewed by the investment community as asset experts, professionals educated in economics, corporate finance and tax law. They are assumed to be investment gurus, individuals highly skilled in seeking out and navigating the best possible avenues for accumulating wealth.

The truth is that stockbrokers are not even required to possess a college degree in order to embark on a career making investment recommendations to the general public. Stockbrokers are not required to meet minimum net worth requirements, to satisfy any sort of residency or internship periods, or to even to demonstrate actual firsthand experience investing their own money before going to work to invest yours.

The requirements to become a licensed stockbroker are minimal at best. They must pass the Series 7 examination, a supervised test consisting of 300 questions, 70% of which must be answered correctly, 70%! According to accepted scholastic interpretation, this means that your stockbroker can score a C- and still legally advise you how to make stock, bond and mutual fund purchases.

Many Stockbrokers Have Little or No Experience

Because the securities industry possesses a rapid turnover rate, firms perpetually search for trainees, individuals with some degree of sales ability that they can sponsor for the Series 7. Firms typically require that applicants pay approximately $600 to cover the cost of registration and study materials.

Many “crash courses” are available to help applicants achieve the required 70% on their Series 7 in the shortest possible time. Trainees may also study independently with the aid of computer programs that offer mock examinations comprised of questions from old examinations. Regardless, it is commonplace for newcomers to the securities industry to pass the Series 7 and be on the phone in less than 60 days.

Once they pass the Series 7, the industry’s self-regulatory organization, the National Association of Securities Dealers or the NASD, performs a criminal background check on the applicant. As long as no felony charges are discovered the applicant becomes a Registered Representative and is legally permitted to get to work. It’s that simple.

As scary as it sounds, the individual who sold you your car or shingled your roof in July can be your stockbroker by September.

Stockbrokers Are Trained Sales Professionals

The rookie stockbroker is then trained to overcome client objections by memorizing “rebuttals” and required to make upwards of 300 phone calls a day to prospect for clients. “Cold calling” as it is known throughout the securities industry, has gained a notorious reputation over the years. With the recent advent of the national “No Call” list investors are afforded some protection against unscrupulous sales practices, but abuses still occur.

Stockbrokers are primarily compensated on a “transactional” basis, meaning that they are only paid when buying or selling stocks for their clients. This is the fundamental conflict between the financial objective of the client and the financial objective of their broker.

There are many ethical and professional registered representatives in the industry today, but it is the unprincipled minority that perpetuates the stereotype of the fast-talking, manipulative stockbroker.

Remember That Stockbrokers…

  • Are not required to possess a college degree
  • Can be licensed in less than two months
  • May have no investment experience
  • Are not required to meet net worth requirements
  • Are compensated when buying and selling stocks
  • Are trained to memorize dialogue to overcome client objections
If you would like to know more about your stockbroker, contact us now and we will perform a background check free of charge. Be ready to provide your broker’s full name as well as the name of their employing firm.

There Are Nine Warning Signs

If you experienced one or more of the following scenarios while doing business with your stockbroker, you may indeed have legal recourse to recover damages. Although situations do vary, the majority of broker negligence falls into the following nine categories.


Churning

Churning occurs when a broker engages in trades solely for the purpose of generating commission. In many cases brokers will liquidate positions at a very small profit in order to cover the commission involved. The client is then contacted and encouraged to trade again, repeating the process over and over until the majority of their funds are eventually lost to losing trades that should never have been placed to begin with.

Churning is probably the most common complaint against brokers. In order to establish this particular claim, if appropriate, we will demonstrate that the trading pattern of the account was without merit and generally excessive. In some cases the broker will contradict his own advice by telling the client that the purchase of a particular stock is a medium or long-term hold and then sell the stock a few days or weeks later. We will calculate the necessary rate of return that would have to occur in order for the commission in the account to be covered. In addition, turnover rate is an important factor in determining whether or not an account was churned. For instance; if $750,000 in stocks were purchased in the course of a year within a $250,000 account, the turnover rate would be approximately 300%.

Also, total commissions generated will be held in comparison to the average equity of the account. For instance, if the same $250,000 account generated $175,000 in commissions and fees over the course of a year or two, the account may have indeed been churned.

If you believe you have been the victim of fraud, click here to Evaluate Your Case or click here to Contact Us immediately. All consultations are free of charge.


[back to top]

Unauthorized Trading

Nearly as common as churning is unauthorized trading or a “UT”. Unauthorized trading means that the broker enacted purchases or sells in an account that the client did not approve prior to execution.

In order to prove this claim the broker’s notes will be reviewed to see if the client was indeed contacted prior to each and every trade. If we believe the broker’s notes have been fabricated we will retrieve phone records to prove or disprove if the broker contacted the client as documented in his client log.

If the broker of record did not keep detailed records pertaining to trades and communications he had with the client, breach of fiduciary duty issues will be highlighted in addition to the allegation of unauthorized trading.

If you believe you have been the victim of fraud, click here to Evaluate Your Case or click here to Contact Us immediately. All consultations are free of charge.

 


[back to top]

Mutual Fund, Bond & Annuity Switching

Switching possesses some of the same qualities as churning but this scenario does not involve meritless trading as a recurring cycle. Instead, the broker encourages the client to sell a particular group of mutual funds, bonds or possible annuities and repurchases a nearly identical instrument for them in order to generate a large commission in just one or two transactions.

The untrained eye can easily overlook switching since most clients rely on the expertise and guidance of their brokers in order to handle their investment accounts. The broker establishes a “control” relationship with the client and provides them with fraudulent reasons why the old instrument should be sold and the new instrument should be purchased.

In order to establish if you were a victim of switching we will draw a comparison between all mutual funds, bonds and annuities that were sold in your account versus those that were purchased. We will also calculate and disclose any hidden commissions or incentives that were received by the broker of record that the client may not have even been aware of.

If you believe you have been the victim of fraud, click here to Evaluate Your Case or click here to Contact Us immediately. All consultations are free of charge.

 


[back to top]

Front Running

Front running means that the broker of record or his employing firm purchased quantities of a particular stock before advising you to buy it in your account at a higher price. It may also mean that they sold positions of a particular stock before instructing you to sell yours at a lower price.

Securities rules clearly state that in both of these scenarios it is required that the client get the best of the executions, discouraging the practice of front running but not eliminating it.

In order to establish if you were the victim of front running it is sometimes necessary to take depositions from the broker or principles of the brokerage firm as well as their traders in order to establish if the firm or its employees held positions in a particular stock. Brokerage firms must also keep records of what stocks are bought and sold in their house accounts. In addition, brokers are required in their employment contracts to disclose all personal trading activity to their compliance department.

If you believe you have been the victim of fraud, click here to Evaluate Your Case or click here to Contact Us immediately. All consultations are free of charge.

 


[back to top]

Unsuitability

The broker, when making each and every trading recommendation, must keep in mind the client’s age, income, trading experience and financial goals. The broker must have an intimate knowledge of the client’s risk tolerance as well, and propose and execute investments that are consistent with the client’s objectives. A broker has a duty to know his client and only recommend investments and trading strategies that are suitable for that client. An investment may be deemed unsuitable if a customer does not have the financial ability to incur the risk associated with a particular investment.

For instance, if an investor expresses to his broker that he is on a fixed income and reliant upon his brokerage account for dividend income in order to meet his monthly expense, the issue of unsuitability will be raised if the broker begins to purchase low-priced NASDAQ issues in the hopes that these $3 and $5 dollar stocks will double or triple in value. If a broker makes trades in a client account that conflict with the client’s investment characteristics, the broker may indeed be liable to that client for losses incurred.

If you believe you have been the victim of fraud, click here to Evaluate Your Case or click here to Contact Us immediately. All consultations are free of charge.

 


[back to top]

Over Concentration

An increasingly common problem amongst brokers is lack of diversification or over concentration. By concentrating the majority of a portfolio in one or two particular stocks or even one or two particular sectors such as technology or financials, risk increases exponentially and dramatic losses can be incurred in relatively short period of time.

Brokers are motivated to do this in some cases by that fact that brokerage firms offer hidden incentives on certain “house stocks” (stocks that the brokerage firm holds in its own inventory or acts as a market maker in). Although this practice is highly frowned upon by regulatory bodies, brokers can receive “chops” or “rips” in these house stocks as much as 20% of their share price. The investor does not usually discover these hidden incentives until it is too late.

Diversification is essential to the success of any portfolio, especially during times of a declining or volatile market. Putting “all your eggs in one basket” is typically a recipe for disaster.

If you believe you have been the victim of fraud, click here to Evaluate Your Case or click here to Contact Us immediately. All consultations are free of charge.

 


[back to top]

Misrepresentation and Omissions

A broker is liable to a client if that broker misrepresents material facts or deliberately omits information during their presentation to the client regarding an investment, and that client loses money as a result. Often these misrepresentations or omissions obscure or downplay the risks associated with a particular investment. A broker has a duty to fairly disclose all of the risks associated with an investment, regardless of how off-putting they may be.

Brokers are also required by law to deliver a fair and balanced presentation, allowing clients to assess risk and reward before exposing their capital to the market. If a broker enthusiastically touts potential profits and minimized or completely omits the inherent risk involved, he or she may indeed be liable for losses if the client proceeds based on their slanted “pitch.”

If you believe you have been the victim of fraud, click here to Evaluate Your Case or click here to Contact Us immediately. All consultations are free of charge.

 


[back to top]

Breach of Fiduciary Duty

Breach is probably the broadest of broker violations.

Simply stated, stockbrokers have a responsibility to put client’s needs before their own. From a legal perspective, a broker is expected to conduct ongoing due diligence on the companies he or she recommends, charge commissions that are fair and reasonable, pay attention to the financial needs of their clients and do their job professionally, and to the best of their ability. In addition, brokers are expected to take appropriate action to cut losses whenever possible and let profits accumulate.

In the event a broker does not follow the instructions set forth by their clients or recommends the purchase of a particular stock strictly to collect a commission they are indeed breaching their fiduciary duty to the client.

If you believe you have been the victim of fraud, click here to Evaluate Your Case or click here to Contact Us immediately. All consultations are free of charge.

 


[back to top]

Fraud

In some extreme cases brokers actually take measures to gain possession of their client’s funds, instructing them to write checks to inappropriate parties, wiring funds from their account or transferring their stocks into other brokerage accounts. The term fraud can also encompass activities such as creating bogus account statements, crossing stock positions between clients and accepting cash incentives from clients for placing “hot issue” IPO stock into their accounts.

If you believe you have been the victim of fraud, click here to Evaluate Your Case or click here to Contact Us immediately. All consultations are free of charge.

 


[back to top]

Evaluate Your Case

Title:           


First name:           


M.I.:           


Last name:           


Address:


City: 
Zip Code:
Phone number (day):  


Phone number (eve):  


E-mail address:  

If the shares were not bought in your name, please tell us the name of the person.

Title:           


First name:           


M.I.:           


Last name:           


What is this person's relationship to you?

Affected person's date of birth? (ie mm/dd/19yy):
Do you believe you or they have suffered from stockbroker fraud:
yesno


What is the name of the brokerage house where the sotcks were purchased?


What is the city and state of brokerage house?


What were the names of the stocks purchased?



What is the estimated total loss of the stocks?


Were the stock(s) purchased because of an analyst's recommendation?
yesno Please briefly describe your fraud issue and legal concern I understand that submitting this form does not
create an attorney client relationship. Agree

    


Contact Us Immediately For a Second Opinion or Free Initial Consultation

Laura Anthony, Founding Partner
e-mail: LauraAnthonyPA@aol.com
800-341-2684
fax: 561-514-0832
Legal & Compliance, LLC
330 Clematis Street, Ste. 217
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Legal & Compliance, LLC
940 Lincoln Road, Ste. 319
Miami Beach, FL 33139

 



© 2002, Legal & Compliance, LLC.