Stockbrokers are
viewed by the investment community as asset experts, professionals educated
in economics, corporate finance and tax law. They are assumed to be
investment gurus, individuals highly skilled in seeking out and navigating
the best possible avenues for accumulating wealth.
The truth is that
stockbrokers are not even required to possess a college degree in order
to embark on a career making investment recommendations to the general
public. Stockbrokers are not required to meet minimum net worth requirements,
to satisfy any sort of residency or internship periods, or to even to
demonstrate actual firsthand experience investing their own money before
going to work to invest yours.
The requirements
to become a licensed stockbroker are minimal at best. They must pass
the Series 7 examination, a supervised test consisting of 300 questions,
70% of which must be answered correctly, 70%! According to accepted
scholastic interpretation, this means that your stockbroker can score
a C- and still legally advise you how to make stock, bond and mutual
fund purchases.
Many
Stockbrokers Have Little or No Experience
Because the securities
industry possesses a rapid turnover rate, firms perpetually search for
trainees, individuals with some degree of sales ability that they can
sponsor for the Series 7. Firms typically require that applicants pay
approximately $600 to cover the cost of registration and study materials.
Many crash
courses are available to help applicants achieve the required
70% on their Series 7 in the shortest possible time. Trainees may also
study independently with the aid of computer programs that offer mock
examinations comprised of questions from old examinations. Regardless,
it is commonplace for newcomers to the securities industry to pass the
Series 7 and be on the phone in less than 60 days.
Once they pass
the Series 7, the industrys self-regulatory organization, the
National Association of Securities Dealers or the NASD, performs a criminal
background check on the applicant. As long as no felony charges are
discovered the applicant becomes a Registered Representative and is
legally permitted to get to work. Its that simple.
As scary as it
sounds, the individual who sold you your car or shingled your roof in
July can be your stockbroker by September.
Stockbrokers
Are Trained Sales Professionals
The rookie stockbroker
is then trained to overcome client objections by memorizing rebuttals
and required to make upwards of 300 phone calls a day to prospect for
clients. Cold calling as it is known throughout the securities
industry, has gained a notorious reputation over the years. With the
recent advent of the national No Call list investors are
afforded some protection against unscrupulous sales practices, but abuses
still occur.
Stockbrokers are
primarily compensated on a transactional basis, meaning
that they are only paid when buying or selling stocks for their clients.
This is the fundamental conflict between the financial objective of
the client and the financial objective of their broker.
There are many
ethical and professional registered representatives in the industry
today, but it is the unprincipled minority that perpetuates the stereotype
of the fast-talking, manipulative stockbroker.
Remember
That Stockbrokers
Are not required to possess a college degree
Can be licensed in less than two months
May have no
investment experience
Are not required
to meet net worth requirements
Are compensated
when buying and selling stocks
Are trained
to memorize dialogue to overcome client objections
If you would
like to know more about your stockbroker, contact
us now and we will perform a background check free of charge. Be ready
to provide your brokers full name as well as the name of their employing
firm.
There
Are Nine Warning Signs
If you experienced
one or more of the following scenarios while doing business with your
stockbroker, you may indeed have legal recourse to recover damages.
Although situations do vary, the majority of broker negligence falls
into the following nine categories.
Churning occurs
when a broker engages in trades solely for the purpose of generating
commission. In many cases brokers will liquidate positions at a very
small profit in order to cover the commission involved. The client is
then contacted and encouraged to trade again, repeating the process
over and over until the majority of their funds are eventually lost
to losing trades that should never have been placed to begin with.
Churning is probably
the most common complaint against brokers. In order to establish this
particular claim, if appropriate, we will demonstrate that the trading
pattern of the account was without merit and generally excessive. In
some cases the broker will contradict his own advice by telling the
client that the purchase of a particular stock is a medium or long-term
hold and then sell the stock a few days or weeks later. We will calculate
the necessary rate of return that would have to occur in order for the
commission in the account to be covered. In addition, turnover rate
is an important factor in determining whether or not an account was
churned. For instance; if $750,000 in stocks were purchased in the course
of a year within a $250,000 account, the turnover rate would be approximately
300%.
Also, total commissions
generated will be held in comparison to the average equity of the account.
For instance, if the same $250,000 account generated $175,000 in commissions
and fees over the course of a year or two, the account may have indeed
been churned.
If you believe
you have been the victim of fraud, click here to Evaluate
Your Case or click here to Contact Us
immediately. All consultations are free of charge.
Nearly
as common as churning is unauthorized trading or a UT.
Unauthorized trading means that the broker enacted purchases or sells
in an account that the client did not approve prior to execution.
In
order to prove this claim the brokers notes will be reviewed
to see if the client was indeed contacted prior to each and every
trade. If we believe the brokers notes have been fabricated
we will retrieve phone records to prove or disprove if the broker
contacted the client as documented in his client log.
If
the broker of record did not keep detailed records pertaining to trades
and communications he had with the client, breach of fiduciary duty
issues will be highlighted in addition to the allegation of unauthorized
trading.
If
you believe you have been the victim of fraud, click here to Evaluate
Your Case or click here to Contact Us
immediately. All consultations are free of charge.
Switching
possesses some of the same qualities as churning but this scenario
does not involve meritless trading as a recurring cycle. Instead,
the broker encourages the client to sell a particular group of mutual
funds, bonds or possible annuities and repurchases a nearly identical
instrument for them in order to generate a large commission in just
one or two transactions.
The
untrained eye can easily overlook switching since most clients rely
on the expertise and guidance of their brokers in order to handle
their investment accounts. The broker establishes a control
relationship with the client and provides them with fraudulent reasons
why the old instrument should be sold and the new instrument should
be purchased.
In
order to establish if you were a victim of switching we will draw
a comparison between all mutual funds, bonds and annuities that were
sold in your account versus those that were purchased. We will also
calculate and disclose any hidden commissions or incentives that were
received by the broker of record that the client may not have even
been aware of.
If
you believe you have been the victim of fraud, click here to Evaluate
Your Case or click here to Contact Us
immediately. All consultations are free of charge.
Front
running means that the broker of record or his employing firm purchased
quantities of a particular stock before advising you to buy it in
your account at a higher price. It may also mean that they sold positions
of a particular stock before instructing you to sell yours at a lower
price.
Securities
rules clearly state that in both of these scenarios it is required
that the client get the best of the executions, discouraging the practice
of front running but not eliminating it.
In
order to establish if you were the victim of front running it is sometimes
necessary to take depositions from the broker or principles of the
brokerage firm as well as their traders in order to establish if the
firm or its employees held positions in a particular stock. Brokerage
firms must also keep records of what stocks are bought and sold in
their house accounts. In addition, brokers are required in their employment
contracts to disclose all personal trading activity to their compliance
department.
If
you believe you have been the victim of fraud, click here to Evaluate
Your Case or click here to Contact Us
immediately. All consultations are free of charge.
The
broker, when making each and every trading recommendation, must keep
in mind the clients age, income, trading experience and financial
goals. The broker must have an intimate knowledge of the clients
risk tolerance as well, and propose and execute investments that are
consistent with the clients objectives. A broker has a duty
to know his client and only recommend investments and trading strategies
that are suitable for that client. An investment may be deemed unsuitable
if a customer does not have the financial ability to incur the risk
associated with a particular investment.
For
instance, if an investor expresses to his broker that he is on a fixed
income and reliant upon his brokerage account for dividend income
in order to meet his monthly expense, the issue of unsuitability will
be raised if the broker begins to purchase low-priced NASDAQ issues
in the hopes that these $3 and $5 dollar stocks will double or triple
in value. If a broker makes trades in a client account that conflict
with the clients investment characteristics, the broker may
indeed be liable to that client for losses incurred.
If
you believe you have been the victim of fraud, click here to Evaluate
Your Case or click here to Contact Us
immediately. All consultations are free of charge.
An
increasingly common problem amongst brokers is lack of diversification
or over concentration. By concentrating the majority of a portfolio
in one or two particular stocks or even one or two particular sectors
such as technology or financials, risk increases exponentially and
dramatic losses can be incurred in relatively short period of time.
Brokers
are motivated to do this in some cases by that fact that brokerage
firms offer hidden incentives on certain house stocks
(stocks that the brokerage firm holds in its own inventory or acts
as a market maker in). Although this practice is highly frowned upon
by regulatory bodies, brokers can receive chops or rips
in these house stocks as much as 20% of their share price. The investor
does not usually discover these hidden incentives until it is too
late.
Diversification
is essential to the success of any portfolio, especially during times
of a declining or volatile market. Putting all your eggs in
one basket is typically a recipe for disaster.
If
you believe you have been the victim of fraud, click here to Evaluate
Your Case or click here to Contact Us
immediately. All consultations are free of charge.
A
broker is liable to a client if that broker misrepresents material
facts or deliberately omits information during their presentation
to the client regarding an investment, and that client loses money
as a result. Often these misrepresentations or omissions obscure or
downplay the risks associated with a particular investment. A broker
has a duty to fairly disclose all of the risks associated with an
investment, regardless of how off-putting they may be.
Brokers
are also required by law to deliver a fair and balanced presentation,
allowing clients to assess risk and reward before exposing their capital
to the market. If a broker enthusiastically touts potential profits
and minimized or completely omits the inherent risk involved, he or
she may indeed be liable for losses if the client proceeds based on
their slanted pitch.
If
you believe you have been the victim of fraud, click here to Evaluate
Your Case or click here to Contact Us
immediately. All consultations are free of charge.
Breach
is probably the broadest of broker violations.
Simply
stated, stockbrokers have a responsibility to put clients needs
before their own. From a legal perspective, a broker is expected to
conduct ongoing due diligence on the companies he or she recommends,
charge commissions that are fair and reasonable, pay attention to
the financial needs of their clients and do their job professionally,
and to the best of their ability. In addition, brokers are expected
to take appropriate action to cut losses whenever possible and let
profits accumulate.
In
the event a broker does not follow the instructions set forth by their
clients or recommends the purchase of a particular stock strictly
to collect a commission they are indeed breaching their fiduciary
duty to the client.
If
you believe you have been the victim of fraud, click here to Evaluate
Your Case or click here to Contact Us
immediately. All consultations are free of charge.
In
some extreme cases brokers actually take measures to gain possession
of their clients funds, instructing them to write checks to
inappropriate parties, wiring funds from their account or transferring
their stocks into other brokerage accounts. The term fraud can also
encompass activities such as creating bogus account statements, crossing
stock positions between clients and accepting cash incentives from
clients for placing hot issue IPO stock into their accounts.
If
you believe you have been the victim of fraud, click here to Evaluate
Your Case or click here to Contact Us
immediately. All consultations are free of charge.